Æóðíàë Viche 2014 ¹22

¹22, 2014

Possible Vectors of Democratization of Ukraine in the Context of Modern Challenges

Possible vectors of democratization of Ukraine while correlating modern challenges with theoretical exploration of the above-mentioned process are analyzed. Proper theoretical background of democratization is noted to ensure its further implementation in practice (including system reformation of political and economic spheres of society, and the latter’s civil sector). Democratization of the post-Soviet countries (which also include Ukraine) is proved to have its own specificity and development orientation. The impact of existing and potential threats on the democratic transformations in Ukraine is shown and analyzed. Such threats are presented through the military and political crisis and the lack of consistency of the reform process. Possible directions to reform political, economic, and civil spheres of Ukraine, taking into account challenges of the military and political crisis and an acute shortage of investment attractiveness of our country, are proposed.
Keywords: democratization, system transformation, reformation, military and political crisis, political process.

Refernces

1. Pro m³stseve samovriaduvannia v Ukrain³: Zakon Ukrainy No. 280/97­VR vid 21 travnia 1997 roku [On Local Self­Government in Ukraine: Law of Ukraine No. 280/97­VR, 21 May 1997]. Available at: <http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/280/97­âð>

2. Pro skhvalennia Kontsepts³i reformuvannia m³stsevoho samovriaduvannia ta terytor³alnoi organ³zats³i vlady v Ukrain³: Rozporiadzhennia Kab³netu M³n³str³v Ukrainy No. 333­r vid 1 kv³tnia 2014 roku [On Approval of the Concept of Reform of Local Self­Government and Territorial Organization of Government in Ukraine: Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 333­r, 1 April 2014]. Available at: <http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/333­2014­ð>

3. Antikorruptsionnomu biuro dadut diktatorskiie polnomochiia i oruzhiie [Anti­Corruption Bureau will receive dictatorial powers and weapons], 12 October 2014. Available at: <http://podrobnosti.ua/power/2014/10/12/997653.html>

4. Butko M. P. and Oliichenko I. M. (2010) ‘Modeliuvannia protses³v samoorgan³zats³i v system³ organ³v derzhavnoho upravl³nnia’ [Modelling of the processes of self­organization in the system of state administration authorities], Ekonomika ta derzhava 5:
87–89.

5. Vainshtein G. I. (2001) ‘Zakonomernosti i problemy postkommunisticheskikh transformatsii’ [Consistency and problems of post­communist transformations] in K. G. Kholodkovsky (ed.) Politicheskiie instituty na rubezhe tysiacheletii. ÕÕ­ÕÕ² veka: Sb. st. [Political institutions at the turn of the millennium. 20th – 21st centuries: Collection of articles]. Dubna: ÎÎÎ ‘Feniks+’, pp. 136–170.

6. Vorona P. V. (2010) ‘Derzhavna p³dtrymka maloho i serednioho b³znesu iak stymuliuvannia rozvytku reg³on³v (zarub³zhny dosv³d)’ [State support for small­ and medium­sized businesses as the promotion of regional development (international experience)], Ekonomika ta derzhava 6: 80–82.

7. Glava Natshvardii Stepan Poltorak poobeshchaiet buntovshchikam razobratsia s dembelem [The Head of the National Guard Stepan Poltorak promises the insurgents to deal with the double­digit midget], 13 October 2014. Available at: <http://podrobnosti.ua/accidents/2014/10/13/997873.html>

8. Latyhina N. (2008) ‘Demokratyzats³ia v krainakh Tsentralnoi ta Skh³dnoi Ievropy: r³znoman³tn³ p³dkhody i un³versaln³ oznaky’ [Democratization in the Central and Eastern Europe: Different approaches and universal features], Naukov³ zapysky ²P³END im. I. F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy 37: 233–243.

9. Perehovory s boievikami ‘DNR’ gubernator Donetskoi oblasti lichno ne vedet [The Governor of the Donetsk region does not conduct negotiations with the ‘DPR’ gunmen in person], 13 October 2014. Available at: <http://www.62.ua/article/640837>

10. Povstian A. S. (2010) ‘Zabezpechennia finansovoi avtonomii orhaniv mistsevoho samovriaduvannia’ [Assurance of financial autonomy of the local self­government authorities], Ekonomika ta derzhava 6: 122–124.

11. Poroshenko vyznachyv front robit dlia Ukrainy do 2020 roku [Poroshenko defined the scope of work for Ukraine by 2020], 25 September 2014. Available at: <http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2014/09/25/7038883/?attempt=1>

12. Huntington S. (1995) ‘Budushchee demokraticheskoho protsessa: ot ekspansii k konsolidatsii’ [Future of the democratic process: From expansion to consolidation], Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyie otnosheniia 10: 87–94.

13. Shamaida T. (2013) ‘Rukh na Skhid. Pidtrymka ukrainskykh partii na Skhodi i Pivdni povilno, ale neukhylno zrostaie’ [Movement to the East. Support for Ukrainian parties in the East and in the South is slowly but steadily increasing]. Available at: <http://texty.org.ua/pg/article/editorial/read/48892/Ruh_na_Skhid_Pidtrymka_ukrajinskyh_partij_na>

14. Shtompka P. (2001) ‘Kulturnaia travma v postkommunisticheskom obshchestve. Statiia vtoraia’ [Cultural trauma in the post­communist society. Article two], trans. by V. V. Repiev and N. V. Romanovsky, Sotsiolohicheskiie issledovaniia 2: 3–12.

15. Armijo L. E., Bierkster T. J. and Lowenthal A. F. (1995) ‘The problems of simulta neous transitions’ in L. Diamond and M. F. Plattner (eds.) Economic Reform and Democracy. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Univ. Press.

16. Aslund A. (1994) ‘The Case for Radical Reform’, Journal of Democracy 5 (4): 63–74.

17. Braudel F. (1958) ‘Historie at Sciences Sociales: La longue durée’, Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations. 13e année 4: 725–753.

18. Hungmao T. (1989) The great transition: political and social change in the Republic of China, Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.

19. Linz J. (1990) ‘Transitions to democracy’, Washington Quarterly 13 (3): 143–164.

20. Offe C. (1991) ‘Capitalism by democratic design? Democrtatic theory facing the triple transition in East Central Europe’, Social Research 58: 865–892.

21. Roeder P. G. (1999) ‘The Revolution of 1989: Postcommunism and the Social Science’, Slavic Review, 58 (4): 743–755.

Mykola PRIMUSH, Yuriy KOVAL