Viche 2015 10

10, 2015

Information society as a network-communication space of control

The article studies the influences of the network systems of communication in the process of globalization on horizontal and vertical segments and structures of the society. It is proven that the networks can act like social institutes and dictate the settlement of any social problems, and at the same time they can depend on socio-economic and political situation in the country and the world in general.
The authors of the research underline that the network principle captures all more spheres, in particular, it shows itself vividly in the development of management and marketing, education, culture, business, media, etc. The role of network structures in the country and, in particular, in the administrative management is priceless.
At the same time structure-network communication systems may not have permanent the only accurate organization. Though, it does not affect the connections between them and their cooperation.
The authors also pay attention to that the network systems challenge a stereotype that it is impossible to control freedom, and they prove the opposite: these systems can control, they can even program a choice and manipulate the consciousness. They come to the conclusion on the development of such phenomenon as the controlled freedom that can carry the hidden threat in itself which should be prevented.
Keywords: information society, information resource, network systems of communication, network-communication space of control.


1. Voronkova V. H. (2015), Internet yak hlobalna tendentsiia rozvytku informatsiinoho suspilstva [Internet as a global trend of development of the information society], Hileia: naukovyi visnyk: zbirnyk naukovykh prats [Gilea: Research Bulletin: scientific research journal], Kyiv: Hileia, 2015, vol. 93 (2), pp. 174179.

2. Rapoport V. S., Dulkin M. Z. (1986), Organizatsyia sistem upravleniia [Control system service], Moscow: ANKh SSSR.

3. Promyslov B. D., Goriunov O. A. (2007), Sovremennaia organizatsyia sistem upravlenyiia [Modern control system service], Moscow: Neft i haz.

4. Gordiienko M. H. and others (2013), Teoriia informatsyi: monografiia [Theory of Information: Monograph], Moscow: RKhTU im. D. Y. Miendielieieva.

5. Castells M. (2000), Informatsyonnaia epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kultura [The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture], Moscow: HU VShE.

6. Malkovskaia I. A. (2005), Mnoholikii Yanus otkrytoho obshchestva: opyt kriticheskoho osmysleniia likov obshchestva v epokhu hlobalizatsyi [Many Faced Janus of the open society: the experience of critical reflection on the faces of the society in the age of globalization], Moscow: KomKnyha.

7. Castells M. (1999), Stanovleniie obshchestva setevykh struktur [Formation of the company networks], in Ynozemtseva V. L. (ed.) Novaia postindustrialnaia volna na Zapade: Antologyia [New post­industrial wave in the West: Anthology], Moscow: Academia, 1999, pp. 494496.

8. Khliebnikova A. A. (2015), Stanovlennia i rozvytok informatsiinoho suspilstva v umovakh hlobalizatsii: teoretyko­metodolohichnyi kontekst [Formation and development of information society in the context of globalization: theoretical and methodological context], Hileia: naukovyi visnyk: zbirnyk naukovykh prats [Gilea: Research Bulletin: scientific research journal], Kyiv: Hileia, 2015, Vol. 92 (1), pp. 170174.

9. Orlova T. M. (2002), Kommunikatsyonnyi menedzhment v upravlenii ekonomicheskimi sistemami [Communication management in the management of economic systems], Moscow: Yzd­vo RAHS.

10. Shadrin A. E. (2000), Setevaia model organyzatsyi [Network model of organization], Informatsyonnoe obshchestvo 2: 8688.

11. Vilchynska I. (2015), Interaktyvnist politychna [Political interactivity], Novitnia politychna leksyka (neolohizmy, okazionalizmy ta inshi novotvory) [The latest political vocabulary (neologisms, occasional and other neoplasms)], in Khoma N. M. (ed.), Lviv.: Novyi Svit­2000, 2015, p. 152.

12. Kantsir V. S. (2011), Teroryzm u suchasnomu hlobalizatsiinomu prostori: filosofsko­pravovyi vymir: monohrafiia [Terrorism in the contemporary global space: philosophical and legal aspects: Monograph], Lviv: Krai.

13. Nafikov I. S. (2012), Tenevaia ekonomika i organyzovannaia prestupnost v uslovyiakh krupnogo goroda [The shadow economy and organized crime in a large city], Kazan: Poznanye.

14. Gates B. (2001), Byznes so skorostiu mysly [Business at the Speed of Thought], Moscow : EKSMO­Press.

15. Miasnykova L. A., Frid M. Y. (2001), Postmodern kommertsyi (transformatsyia kommertsyi v sovremennom obshchestve) [Postmodern commerce (transformation of commerce in the modern society)], Saint Petersburg: Byznes­pressa.

16. Markarian K. V. (2002), Obshchaia teoriia postindustrialnogo gosudarstva [General theory of post­industrial state], Moscow: URSS.

17. Drucker P. F. (2007), Zadachi menedzhmenta v XXI veke [Management Challenges for the 21st Century], Translated by Makarova N. M., Moscow: Yzd. dom Viliams.

18. Adorno T. W. (1956), Television and the Patterns of Mass Culture Mass Culture: The Popular Arts in America, Glencoe: The Free Press.

19. Naumenko T. V. (2005), Sotsyologyia massovoi kommunykatsyi [Sociology of Mass Communication], Saint Petersburg: Pyter.

20. McLuhan M. (2007), Ponimanie Media: vneshnie rasshyreniia cheloveka [Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man], Translated by Nikolaev V. H., 2nd ed., Moscow: Giperboreia: Kuchkovo pole.

21. Pugachev V. P. (2005), Upravlenie svobodoi [Management of freedom], Moscow: KomKniga.

22. Koleda S. (2000), Modelirovanie bessoznatelnogo [Modeling unconsciousness], Moscow: Institut obshchegumanitarnykh issledovanii.

23. Serkyna N. E. (2005), Paradihma sotsyalnogo upravleniia v teorii i praktike sotsyalnoi modernizatsyi: avtoreferat [Paradigm of social control in the theory and practice of social modernization: autoabstract], Yoshkar­Ola.

Oleksandr DZOBAN, Oleksandr SOSNIN