| In English
Viche 2014 18

18, 2014

Objectivity of Examination of a Criminal Event at the Stage of Pretrial Proceedings Is Impossible without Freedom of Thought and Action of the Subject to Conduct an Investigation

The institute of pretrial proceedings under a new Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine is studied. Rules of criminal procedural legislation on a procedural form of pretrial investigation; powers of an investigator and their relationships with a prosecutor and a head of the investigative unit are analyzed. A number of irregularities of the normative regulation of social relations practically arising during pretrial investigation and relating to significant restrictions of procedural independence and autonomy of an investigator are detected. The author points out some rules of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine of 1960 which could effectively have been applied in such situations.r
Appropriate suggestions for improvement of current legislation regarding the procedural status of an investigator are made.r
Keywords: investigator, prosecutor, head of the investigative unit, pretrial investigation, investigative examination of a criminal event.r

References

1. Blenchuk P. (2013) Metodolohchn zasady naukovogo zabezpechennia krymnalnoho provadzhennia [Methodological principles of scientific support of the criminal proceedings], Viche 14: 13­15.

2. Bobrytsky L. V. (2013) Problemn pytannia provedennia neglasnykh sldchikh (rozshukovykh) di pry rozslduvann zlochinv, uchinenykh organzovanymy ugrupuvanniamy, u kontekst novogo protsesualnogo zakonodavstva [Problematic issues on covert investigative (detective) actions while investigating crimes committed by organized groups in the context of new procedural legislation], Borotba z organzovanoiu zlochinnstiu i koruptsieiu (teoria i praktyka) 2 (30): 3­8.

3. Romaniuk B. V. (2011) Udoskonalennia dosudovogo provadzhennia v Ukrain [Improvement of pretrial proceedings in Ukraine], Kyiv: MNDTS.

4. Rudenko M. and Pvnenko V. (2013) Pro sutnst prokurorskoho protsesualnoho kervnytstva dosudovym rozslduvanniam [On the essence of prosecutor procedural management of pretrial investigation], Iurydychny chasopys Natsonalnoi akademii vnutrshnkh sprav 1:
277­283.

5. Teplov B. M. (1961) Problemy individualnykh razlichii [Problems of individual differences], Moscow: Izd­vo APN RSFSR.

6. Tyshchenko S. (2013) Subiekty vzaiemodi storony obvynuvachennia pid chas dosudovogo rozslduvannia [Subjects of interaction of the prosecution during the preliminary investigation], Visnyk prokuratury 1: 49­54.

7. Iurchyshyn V. M. (2013) Mstse i rol prokurora v dosudovomu rozslduvann ta ikh vdobrazhennia v teori, zakonodavstv i praktyts: Monografia [Place and role of a prosecutor in the pretrial investigation and their reflection in theory, legislation, and practice: Monograph], Chernivtsi: Rodovid.

Bohdan ROMANIUK