¹20, 2014 Capital City as an Object of Administration: Comparative Legal AspectsThe capital city is determined to play a leading role in all spheres of public life and, compared to other cities, to have many peculiarities of its legal status. Because of its special legal status, the capital city is proved to belong to the complex administration objects that, in particular, may be determined through distinctive legislative acts being in force in the capital or through its separation as a certain administrative-territorial unit. Based on the analysis of constitutional acts of the European states, it is concluded that there is no integrated approach to the regulation of status of the capital city in different countries.
References 1. Baidakov S. L. (2010) Teoriia i metodolohiia stratehicheskoho upravleniia mehapolisom i eho territorialnymi edinitsami: avtoref. diss. … dokt. ekon. nauk: 08.00.05 [Theory and methodology of strategic administration of the metropolis and its territorial units: Dissertation abstract for the Doctor of Economic Science, specialty: 08.00.05]. Ìoscow. 2. Balts³i I. (2011) ‘Konstytuts³inopravov³ zasady lokalnoi normotvorchost³’ [Constitutional and legal principles of local rulemaking], Iurydychny visnyk 3: 45–52. 3. BoikoBoichuk O. V. (2010) Derzhavne upravl³nnia rozvytkom mista: model³ ta mekhan³zmy: monohraf³ia [Public administration of a city’s development: Models and mechanisms: Monograph]. Kyiv: Univ. vydvî ‘Pulsary’. 4. Burak P. I. (2006) Osnovy ekonomiki stolichnoho mehapolisa: monohraf³ia [Principles of the capital metropolis economy: Monograph]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo ‘Ekonomika’. 5. Kuib³da V. (2010) Formuvannia d³iezdatnykh terytor³alnykh gromad: monohraf³ia [Formation of sustainable territorial communities: Monograph]. Kyiv: IKTS ‘Legalny status’. 6. Oseevsky M. E. (2012) Upravleniie innovatsionnym sotsialnoekonomicheskim razvitiem mehapolisa, oriientirovannym na indikatory kachestva zhizni: avtoref. diss. … dokt. ekon. nauk: 08.00.05 [Management of innovative social and economic development of a metropolis focused on the life quality indicators: Dissertation abstract for the Doctor of Economic Science, specialty: 08.00.05]. Saint Petersburg. 7. Prypolova L. (2013) ‘Problemn³ pytannia zakonodavchoho rehuliuvannia statusu Avtonomnoi Respubl³ky Krym ta mist v Ukrain³’ [Problematic issues of legislative regulation of the status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and cities in Ukraine], Viche 24: 14–17. 8. Upravl³nnia suchasnym m³stom [Administration of a modern city] (2008), Vakulenko V. M. and Orlaty M. K. (eds.). Kyiv: NADU. 9. Fedorenko V. (2012) ‘Stolytsia Ukrainy – mistogeroi Kyiv: poniattia, adm³n³stratyvnoterytor³alny ustr³i i funkts³i’ [The capital of Ukraine – the Hero City of Kyiv: Concept, administrativeterritorial division, and functions], Publichne pravo 4 (8): 23–30. 10. Khonda M. P. (2007) Konstytuts³inopravovy status stolyts³ Ukrainy – mista Kyieva: avtoref. dys. … kand. iuryd. nauk: 12.00.02 [Constitutional and legal status of the capital of Ukraine – the city of Kyiv: Dissertation abstract for the Ph.D. in Law, specialty: 12.00.02]. Kyiv. 11. Ialovy V. B. (2010) Osoblyvost³ zd³isnennia m³stsevoho samovriaduvannia v stolychny ahlomerats³i: avtoref. dys. … kand. derzh. upravl.: 25.00.04 [Special features of local selfgovernment in the capital agglomeration: Dissertation abstract for the Ph.D. in Public Administration, specialty: 25.00.04]. Kyiv. 12. Hall Ð. (2006) ‘The World’s Urban System: A European Perspective’, Global Urban Development, vol. 2, issue 1. Available at: http://globalurban.org/Issue1PIMag05/Hall%20article.htm Iuliia SKOPNENKO |