| In English
Viche 2014 20

20, 2014

Favouritism and Cronyism as the Main Criteria for Personnel Selection of Political and Administrative Elite in Ukraine

The problem of usage of favouritism, nepotism and cronyism in the process of formation of political and administrative elite in Ukraine is highlighted. It is presented theoretical material which contains information on the interpretation of definitions of favouritism, nepotism, and cronyism, as well as the ruling elite models. The main scientific approaches concerning usefulness of the personnel selection based on family, close or other relations are reviewed. It is concluded on the necessity to form political and administrative elite which defends the national idea and determined current trends to select candidates for the posts in the highest echelons of power in Ukraine.
Keywords: favouritism, nepotism, cronyism, elite, power.


1. Pro zasady zapobhannia i protydi koruptsi. Zakon Ukrainy No. 3206­VI vid 7 kvtnia 2011 roku [On Principles of Preventing and Counteracting Corruption. The Law of Ukraine No. 3206­VI, 7 April 2011]. Available at: <http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3206­17>

2. Gelei S. D. and Rutar S. M. (2001) Politolohiia [Politology]. Lviv: Svit.

3. Lavrenko O. (2000) Transformatsia susplstva i kontseptsia kruhoobhu elt [Transformation of society and the concept of circulation of elites], Ukrainian Elite and Its Role in the State Building: Proceedings of the All­Ukrainian scientific and practical conference, Kyiv, 1819 May 2000. Kyiv: Viisk. gumanit. in­t Nats. akad. oborony Ukrainy, pp. 168173.

4. Motrenko . (2010) Profesina etyka publchnoi sluzhby ta zapobhannia konflktu nteresv: Porohova programa korporatsi Vyklyky tysiacholttia [Professional ethics of the public service and conflict of interest: Threshold Programme of the Millennium Challenges Corporation], Main Department of the Civil Service of Ukraine. yiv. Available at: <http://nads.gov.ua/document/266106/ethics.pdf>

5. Osnovy protivodeistviia korruptsii [Fundamentals of counteracting corruption] (2004), Rohov I. I., Mami K. A., Bychkova S. F. (eds.). Almaty: F ransparensi Kazakhstan, FPPI Intehral in Kazakhstan.

6. Piren M. I. (2004) Problemy formuvannia suchasnoi ukrainskoi elity [Problems of formation of the modern Ukrainian elite], Sotsialna psykholohiia 2 (4): 3848.

7. Tomkna O. (2014) Pryntsypy dobrochesnost derzhavnoi vlady: postanovka problemy [Principles of the virtue of state power: Problem statement], Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy 1 (76):

8. Traverse O. O. (2010) Poltychne lderstvo ta kervnytstvo doby lberalzovanoho totaltaryzmu v SRSR: ukrainsky kontekst (60­i pochatok 90­kh rokiv XX stolittia): avtoref. dys. dokt. polit. nauk: 23.00.02 [Political leadership and administration in the period of liberalized totalitarianism in the USSR: Ukrainian context (1960­s early 1990­s): Dissertation abstract for the Doctor in Political Science, specialty: 23.00.02]. Kyiv.

9. Alper Buyukarslan B. and Derya Ergun Ozler N. (2011) The overall outlook of favoritism in organization: A literature review, International Journal of Business and Management Studies, vol. 3, No. 1: 275284.

10. Macquarie Dictionary. Available at: <https://www.macquariedictionary.com.au>

11. Oxford English Dictionary: The definitive record of the English language. Available at: <http://www.oed.com>

12. Solomon D. Nepotism, patronage and the public trust, 27 February 2014. Available at: http://www.integrity.qld.gov.au/library/document/catalogue/speeches­articles/Nepotism%20and%20the%20public%20trust%20(2).pdf