| In English
Viche 2014 20

20, 2014

Capital City as an Object of Administration: Comparative Legal Aspects

The capital city is determined to play a leading role in all spheres of public life and, compared to other cities, to have many peculiarities of its legal status. Because of its special legal status, the capital city is proved to belong to the complex administration objects that, in particular, may be determined through distinctive legislative acts being in force in the capital or through its separation as a certain administrative-territorial unit. Based on the analysis of constitutional acts of the European states, it is concluded that there is no integrated approach to the regulation of status of the capital city in different countries.
Keywords: capital, metropolis, agglomeration, administration, constitution.

References

1. Baidakov S. L. (2010) Teoriia i metodolohiia stratehicheskoho upravleniia mehapolisom i eho territorialnymi edinitsami: avtoref. diss. dokt. ekon. nauk: 08.00.05 [Theory and methodology of strategic administration of the metropolis and its territorial units: Dissertation abstract for the Doctor of Economic Science, specialty: 08.00.05]. oscow.

2. Baltsi I. (2011) Konstytutsino­pravov zasady lokalnoi normotvorchost [Constitutional and legal principles of local rule­making], Iurydychny visnyk 3: 4552.

3. Boiko­Boichuk O. V. (2010) Derzhavne upravlnnia rozvytkom mista: model ta mekhanzmy: monohrafia [Public administration of a citys development: Models and mechanisms: Monograph]. Kyiv: Univ. vyd­v Pulsary.

4. Burak P. I. (2006) Osnovy ekonomiki stolichnoho mehapolisa: monohrafia [Principles of the capital metropolis economy: Monograph]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Ekonomika.

5. Kuibda V. (2010) Formuvannia diezdatnykh terytoralnykh gromad: monohrafia [Formation of sustainable territorial communities: Monograph]. Kyiv: IKTS Legalny status.

6. Oseevsky M. E. (2012) Upravleniie innovatsionnym sotsialno­ekonomicheskim razvitiem mehapolisa, oriientirovannym na indikatory kachestva zhizni: avtoref. diss. dokt. ekon. nauk: 08.00.05 [Management of innovative social and economic development of a metropolis focused on the life quality indicators: Dissertation abstract for the Doctor of Economic Science, specialty: 08.00.05]. Saint Petersburg.

7. Prypolova L. (2013) Problemn pytannia zakonodavchoho rehuliuvannia statusu Avtonomnoi Respublky Krym ta mist v Ukrain [Problematic issues of legislative regulation of the status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and cities in Ukraine], Viche 24: 1417.

8. Upravlnnia suchasnym mstom [Administration of a modern city] (2008), Vakulenko V. M. and Orlaty M. K. (eds.). Kyiv: NADU.

9. Fedorenko V. (2012) Stolytsia Ukrainy misto­geroi Kyiv: poniattia, admnstratyvno­terytoralny ustri i funktsi [The capital of Ukraine the Hero City of Kyiv: Concept, administrative­territorial division, and functions], Publichne pravo 4 (8): 2330.

10. Khonda M. P. (2007) Konstytutsino­pravovy status stolyts Ukrainy mista Kyieva: avtoref. dys. kand. iuryd. nauk: 12.00.02 [Constitutional and legal status of the capital of Ukraine the city of Kyiv: Dissertation abstract for the Ph.D. in Law, specialty: 12.00.02]. Kyiv.

11. Ialovy V. B. (2010) Osoblyvost zdisnennia mstsevoho samovriaduvannia v stolychny ahlomeratsi: avtoref. dys. kand. derzh. upravl.: 25.00.04 [Special features of local self­government in the capital agglomeration: Dissertation abstract for the Ph.D. in Public Administration, specialty: 25.00.04]. Kyiv.

12. Hall . (2006) The Worlds Urban System: A European Perspective, Global Urban Development, vol. 2, issue 1. Available at: http://globalurban.org/Issue1PIMag05/Hall%20article.htm

Iuliia SKOPNENKO